FY 2001 Formula
Allocations for CDBG, HOME, HOPWA and ESG
HUDs FY 2001 Appropriations Act (P.L. 106-377) was enacted
in October 2000. In December 2000, Congress enacted a Consolidated
Appropriations Act (P.L. 106-554) which requires an across-the-board
rescission of 0.22% (less than one-fourth of one percent) of all
discretionary budget authority enacted for FY 2001. All HUD programs
will be impacted, including the formula allocations for CDBG,
HOME, HOPWA, and ESG.
With a few exceptions, the attached list shows the amounts that
will be available this year. The amounts shown include each jurisdictions
share of the FY 2001 appropriation, plus their share of the reallocation
of any funds recaptured from prior years. Any metropolitan city
that is in joint grant agreements with an urban county does not
appear in the list; their allocation has been added to the allocation
of the parent urban county.
Four grantees have entered into agreements with CPD to repay
HOME funds. The amounts that are to be returned will be deducted
from the amounts shown in the attached list. The grantees are:
- Atlanta, GA $300,000
- Garden Grove, CA $250,000
- Riverside County, CA $100,000
- Kentucky State Program $37,000
Money is being retained from the State of New Yorks CDBG
allocation for previous commitments made for the Canal Corridor
projects. The amount being retained is being determined and will
be deducted from the allocation amount shown in the attached list.
There are 5 communities that are getting $1,000 or $2,000 more
HOME money after the rescission reduction than they got before.
This occurs because of rounding allocations to the nearest $1,000.
The communities getting a rounding based HOME increase are: Surry
County, NC; Bryan, Wichita Falls, and Brazoria County, TX; and
Kenosha, WI.
Again due to rounding adjustments, the ESG allocations to the
states of Delaware and Rhode Island will be $1,000 higher after
the rescission adjustment.
The CDBG allocation for the State of Hawaii is shown as zero
in the attached report. The allocation for the HUD administered
small cities program in Hawaii is distributed among the three
counties that participate in the program. These places and their
allocations are shown on the last page of the report along with
the insular areas.
Any questions about the allocation amounts may be directed to
Marge Siegel or Bob Meehan.
We are reworking the allocation files and documentation to reflect
the amounts in the attached table. It will take about a week for
Systems Development and Evaluation Division staff to get this
to the Budget Division and from there it will be sent to the HUD
Accounting Division. Please contact your desk offiers should you
have any questions about the status of this effort.
(See attached file: ESG_ HOPWA_
CDBG_ HOME FY2001 After Rescission Adjustment)
|